CHESHIRE West and Chester Council leader Mike Jones pledged that all issues raised by the public regarding six proposed Gypsy and Traveller sites will be considered in full.

At last Wednesday night’s two-hour executive meeting members decided to note an independent consultant’s report recommending the sites and to move forward to the planning application stage.

Cllr Jones said: “This is merely the start of a necessary process. Moving to the planning stage will allow full public consultation.

“I can assure everyone that the major issues raised in respect of all of these sites will be reviewed in full.”

Cllr Jones told the 300 members of the public who attended that it was the largest turnout he had seen at a council meeting.

He said: “At the moment we have a process of anarchy – if not chaos – in the way that sites in open countryside and the Green Belt can be developed by the Gypsy and Traveller community in a way that you or I cannot.

“We have 38 sites that have been randomly created because we have lost appeals in this way. That is not acceptable for our communities.

“There are also 24 sites with temporary planning permission, again randomly created where individuals have bought land to site caravans on.”

The leader told members that the Government had made promises about dealing with the issue but it was not doing so because of difficulties it had to comply with.

“Indeed, there is a consultation paper out now that actually puts a more onerous requirement on this council by requiring a five-year commitment of provision of sites for Gypsies and Travellers,” said Cllr Jones.

Cllr Jones called on MPs to change the rules the council and other local authorities had to comply with.

He added: “The removal of those sorts of requirements would be incredibly helpful to give this council a bit more flexibility on how it deals with these sorts of problems.”

Addressing the packed room, Cllr Lynne Riley, executive member for community and environment, said: “Our failure to deliver viable solutions has meant many communities have been impacted in a negative way because this authority has had no control over what takes place on these sites.”